ShoreTel and Cisco are arguably the top two VoIP leaders today, and on a feature-by-feature basis are essentially identical over time. They have similar advanced feature options such as contact center, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), Audio & Web Conferencing, and a range of choices for IP telephone sets. The two systems also require a similar network switching and cabling infrastructure, but that is where the similarities end.
In this post, we’ll explore some of the major differences between these two products so you can decide which system is right for you.
Scalability
ShoreTel’s solution consists of a single system that is scalable from 1-20,000 users with all of the call processing, analog devices, and PSTN connections handled through ShoreGear Voice Switches which are sized according to requirements. One server (physical or virtual) is required for management, voicemail, and automated attendant unless server redundancy is required.
There are optional licenses for an operator, workgroup agent, or workgroup supervisor which adds additional capabilities, and integration to Outlook and Internet Messaging are standard features.
Cisco, on the other hand, consists of a portfolio of telephony systems with size limits that are not upgradable. These would include Unified Communications for Small Business (2 Options), Unified Communications Express (router based), Business Edition (3 options), and Unified Communications Manager (server based) requiring a Cisco MCS7800 series server. PSTN connections would require a Cisco Router, and analog devices would require a separate analog gateway, similar to ShoreTel.
Redundancy
Adding redundancy to the ShoreTel System is as simple as adding a low cost ShoreGear Voice Switch anywhere on the network. In the event of a voice switch failure, the IP phones for that site will automatically re-register to that backup switch until the defective unit is replaced. Voicemail redundancy can be added by utilizing either a V-Series voice switch or Distributed Voice Services Server.
Depending on the system implemented, Cisco would require a second hardware and licensing component for the system + voicemail on a per site basis with the exception of Unified Communications Manager. This exception is a centralized design and would require only one physical MCS7800 server or Virtual Machine and voicemail to add redundancy.
Recommendation: Have both systems designed with redundancy if required.
System Management
ShoreTel Director is the software component that resides on the server and is the single management interface for the entire ShoreTel System. It is intuitive, easy to learn and operate, and can be managed by anyone in the company once trained.
Because the Cisco system was built through numerous acquisitions (22), there are multiple management interfaces to use (Call Manager, Unity Voicemail, and Cisco IOS). These are significantly more complex and will require a Cisco certified engineer to understand and manage these interfaces.
Recommendation: Have both vendors demonstrate the management interfaces, and end user controls. If you choose Cisco, make sure you have engineers on staff to manage it.
Ownership Cost Considerations
ShoreTel will have significantly lower implementation, change order, and training costs (25%) as well as lower annual maintenance costs. Maintenance is based on a percentage of hardware + licensing costs (13%), and software upgrades are included as part of the maintenance plan with the exception of labor for the upgrades.
Cisco’s complexity will require significantly more time to implement, train, and test resulting in higher costs. Maintenance is on a per device basis through Smartnet, and will require 3 Smartnet components; hardware, software, and upgrades.
Recommendation: Run a 3 and 5 year total cost of ownership analysis.
VoIP System Considerations
Before choosing one of these phone systems ask the following questions to ensure you will choose the right system for your company’s needs:
- Will your IT infrastructure support a VoIP deployment? (see #3)
- What internal IT resources are available to support the system?
- Have you completed an IP Telephony network assessment?
- Are the 2 systems comparable? Redundant design, PSTN failover.
- What are your long term growth plans? Is the system scalable to meet those needs?
The bottom line is to do your homework. There are pros and cons to both systems, but you must determine the resources you have one staff, you current infrastructure and your company’s long-term needs to find the right fit for you. Is the cost differential justified?
Considering ShoreTel or Cisco solution? What questions do you have about the two systems?
Posted by: Alan Burdine